On August 23, 1973, Jan-Erik Olsson, a convict on furlough from prison, attempted to rob the Kreditbanken located at Norrmalmstorg Square. Armed with a submachine gun, he took four bank employees hostage: Birgitta Lundblad, Elisabeth Oldgren, Kristin Enmark, and Sven Säfström. Olsson’s demands included three million kronor, bulletproof vests, and the release of his friend Clark Olofsson from prison. As negotiations unfolded, the situation escalated. Olsson fired shots that injured a police officer and threatened the lives of his hostages. The drama played out live on Swedish television, capturing the nation’s attention and concern.
The Hostage Situation
Over the next six days, hostages were held in a vault while police surrounded the bank. Surprisingly, as time passed, the hostages began to develop sympathetic feelings towards their captors. Kristin Enmark even expressed her fear of police intervention rather than her captors during a phone call with Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme. This unexpected bond between hostages and captors left psychologists puzzled. When police finally intervened on August 28, they used tear gas to force Olsson and Olofsson to surrender. Remarkably, when freed, the hostages refused to testify against their captors. Instead, they demonstrated a bizarre sense of loyalty; some even raised money for Olsson’s legal defense.
The Emergence of Stockholm Syndrome
The term “Stockholm Syndrome” was coined by criminologist Nils Bejerot after observing the behavior of the hostages during and after their captivity. He suggested that their bond with their captors was a psychological response to the trauma of being held hostage. Initially called “Norrmalmstorgssyndromet,” it later became widely known as Stockholm Syndrome. This phenomenon has since been studied extensively in psychology. It raises questions about human behavior under duress and how individuals can develop empathy for those who threaten them. Critics argue that not all instances of captor-captive relationships fit this model, but the term remains popular in discussions about hostage situations and abusive relationships.
Baffling Behaviors
The aftermath of the hostage crisis revealed some astonishing behaviors among the former hostages:
- Friendships Formed: One hostage later befriended one of the robbers.
- Legal Defense Fundraising: Another hostage actively raised money for Olsson’s legal defense.
- Public Sympathy: Many members of the public expressed sympathy for both the hostages and their captors.
These actions baffled law enforcement officials and psychologists alike, highlighting the complex nature of human emotions in extreme situations.
Fun Facts About Stockholm Syndrome
- Historical Context: The term originated from a bank robbery that occurred in 1973 but has since been applied to various situations involving captives.
- Psychological Interest: The syndrome has sparked extensive research into trauma responses and human relationships.
- Cultural Impact: The concept has permeated popular culture, appearing in films, literature, and discussions about abusive relationships.
- Not Universally Accepted: Some psychologists dispute the validity of Stockholm Syndrome as a formal diagnosis.
Conclusion
The 1973 bank robbery in Stockholm not only led to a dramatic hostage crisis but also introduced a term that would forever alter our understanding of human psychology under duress. Stockholm Syndrome serves as a reminder of how complex human emotions can be when faced with life-threatening situations. As we continue to study this phenomenon, it offers valuable insights into empathy, survival instincts, and the intricacies of human relationships.
